There are several court rulings in which the Hon. ![]() I have seen in most of the cases Employers are mixing the terms of Income Tax Act with employment conditions just to deny the Social Security Benefits to employees which amounts to unfair labor practice and may invite legal complications afterwards. The terms Consultants/ Professionals have no meaning under any employment/labor related acts like EPF, ESIC, ID Act, Grautity Act, Industrial employment act etc. The provisions and scope of Income Tax Act is very much limited to one's income and liability to pay taxes.Īll employment related issues are governed by the labor Acts and not by Income Tax Act. The term Employee has been claerly defined under various Acts like Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, Employees Provident Fund Act, ESIC Act, Minimum Wages Act, payment of Wages Act, payment of Grauity Act etc.Ĭonsultants/ Professionals are the terms used in Income Tax Act only. there is no third catergory on employment. i.e Employees on payroll of the employer and contractor employees or independent contractor. ![]() ![]() ![]() We all need to understand the basic fact that there are only two categories on employment under any Labor Act.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |